Tue Mar 06, 2012 at 12:17:26 PM EST
Okay, let's lead this off with the DRA file, after that, some geek stats.
The DRA File
Twohundertseventy :: Stats for the NY Special Master Map
District Obama McCain D R 1 51.4 % 47.6 % 54 % 46 % 2 51.2 % 47.9 % 53.5 % 46.5 % 3 53.5 % 45.6 % 55.9 % 44.1 % 4 55.3 % 43.9 % 57 % 43 % 5 86.3 % 13.4 % 87 % 13 % 6 63.5 % 35.6 % 67.8 % 32.2 % 7 84.4 % 14.9 % 86.7 % 13.3 % 8 83.6 % 16.1 % 84.6 % 15.4 % 9 86.1 % 13.4 % 87.1 % 12.9 % 10 75.7 % 23.3 % 76.2 % 23.8 % 11 48.3 % 50.9 % 52.1 % 47.9 % 12 80.2 % 18.8 % 76.6 % 23.4 % 13 93.3 % 6.1 % 93.6 % 6.4 % 14 76.1 % 23.2 % 78.1 % 21.9 % 15 94.5 % 5.2 % 95.7 % 4.3 % 16 72.9 % 26.5 % 71.5 % 28.5 % 17 57.9 % 41.3 % 60.2 % 39.8 % 18 52.1 % 46.8 % 54.3 % 45.7 % 19 53 % 45.3 % 53.3 % 46.7 % 20 58.3 % 39.8 % 59.8 % 40.2 % 21 51.7 % 46.7 % 53.8 % 46.2 % 22 49.1 % 49.1 % 50.9 % 49.1 % 23 49.6 % 48.8 % 49 % 51 % 24 56.2 % 42 % 57.5 % 42.5 % 25 58.8 % 39.9 % 59.6 % 40.4 % 26 63.5 % 35 % 58.9 % 41.1 % 27 44.5 % 53.9 % 42.3 % 57.7 %
District White Black Hispanic Asian 1 78 % 4 % 13 % 3 % 2 66 % 9 % 20 % 3 % 3 72 % 3 % 10 % 13 % 4 61 % 14 % 18 % 5 % 5 12 % 50 % 19 % 11 % 6 38 % 4 % 18 % 37 % 7 28 % 8 % 43 % 18 % 8 22 % 52 % 18 % 5 % 9 30 % 50 % 11 % 6 % 10 65 % 4 % 12 % 17 % 11 64 % 7 % 16 % 11 % 12 67 % 5 % 13 % 13 % 13 12 % 27 % 55 % 4 % 14 25 % 10 % 47 % 16 % 15 2 % 29 % 65 % 2 % 16 40 % 30 % 23 % 5 % 17 63 % 10 % 20 % 6 % 18 72 % 8 % 15 % 3 % 19 86 % 4 % 6 % 1 % 20 80 % 9 % 5 % 4 % 21 92 % 3 % 3 % 1 % 22 89 % 4 % 3 % 2 % 23 90 % 3 % 3 % 2 % 24 84 % 8 % 4 % 2 % 25 72 % 15 % 7 % 3 % 26 71 % 18 % 5 % 3 % 27 93 % 2 % 2 % 1 %
District WhiteVAP BlackVAP HispanicVAP AsianVAP 1 80 % 4 % 11 % 3 % 2 69 % 8 % 19 % 3 % 3 74 % 3 % 9 % 13 % 4 63 % 13 % 17 % 5 % 5 13 % 50 % 18 % 11 % 6 40 % 4 % 17 % 37 % 7 29 % 8 % 41 % 19 % 8 25 % 51 % 17 % 5 % 9 30 % 51 % 11 % 6 % 10 65 % 4 % 12 % 17 % 11 67 % 6 % 14 % 11 % 12 68 % 4 % 12 % 13 % 13 14 % 27 % 53 % 4 % 14 28 % 10 % 45 % 16 % 15 3 % 29 % 64 % 2 % 16 42 % 30 % 21 % 5 % 17 64 % 10 % 19 % 6 % 18 74 % 8 % 13 % 3 % 19 88 % 4 % 5 % 1 % 20 83 % 8 % 4 % 4 % 21 92 % 3 % 2 % 1 % 22 91 % 3 % 3 % 2 % 23 91 % 3 % 3 % 2 % 24 86 % 7 % 3 % 2 % 25 76 % 13 % 6 % 3 % 26 75 % 16 % 4 % 3 % 27 94 % 2 % 2 % 1 %
District 1 2 3 4 5 1 Bishop 97% Israel 3% 2 Israel 53% King 47% 3 Israel 39% Ackerman 33% King 23% Meeks 3% Bishop 1% 4 McCarthy 81% King 19% 5 Meeks 81% McCarthy 11% Turner 5% Ackerman 2% 6 Turner 45% Ackerman 38% Crowley 8% Meeks 6% Velazquez 3% 7 Velazquez 71% Towns 12% Turner 7% Clarke 7% Maloney 3% 8 Towns 61% Turner 17% Nadler 9% Clarke 7% Velazquez 3% 9 Clarke 68% Towns 21% Turner 11% 10 Nadler 69% Rangel 14% Grimm 8% Clarke 5% Turner 3% 11 Grimm 88% Nadler 9% Turner 3% 12 Maloney 77% Velazquez 13% Nadler 10% 13 Rangel 73% Engel 14% Serrano 12% Maloney 1% 14 Crowley 62% Ackerman 20% Maloney 11% Velazquez 5% Rangel 2% 15 Serrano 84% Crowley 16% 16 Engel 49% Lowey 44% Crowley 6% 17 Lowey 48% Engel 32% Hayworth 20% 18 Hayworth 74% Hinchey 23% Gibson 2% Lowey 1% 19 Gibson 44% Hinchey 38% Hanna 7% Tonko 7% Hayworth 4% 20 Tonko 83% Gibson 17% Bishop 0% 21 Owens 62% Gibson 33% Tonko 4% Hanna 1% 22 Hanna 56% Hinchey 23% Owens 20% 23 Reed 54% Higgins 19% Hanna 17% Hinchey 10% 24 Buerkle 80% Owens 11% Hanna 10% 25 Slaughter 38% Reed 28% Hochul 20% Buerkle 14% 26 Higgins 42% Slaughter 37% Hochul 20% 27 Hochul 53% Higgins 27% Reed 11% Slaughter 9%
District Kerry Bush Clinton Lazio 1 49.3% 50.7% 40.7% 59.3% 2 49.5% 50.5% 41.2% 58.8% 3 51.8% 48.2% 44.9% 55.1% 4 54.4% 45.6% 47.3% 52.7% 5 84.8% 15.2% 83% 17% 6 60.1% 39.9% 57.6% 42.4% 7 81.5% 18.5% 81% 19% 8 80.3% 19.7% 80.9% 19.1% 9 83.3% 16.7% 84.3% 15.7% 10 72.2% 27.8% 69.2% 30.8% 11 43.4% 56.6% 42.8% 57.2% 12 76.8% 23.2% 71.8% 28.2% 13 91.7% 8.3% 90.3% 9.7% 14 70.7% 29.3% 71.1% 28.9% 15 91.8% 8.2% 93% 7% 16 68.1% 31.9% 63.6% 36.4% 17 54% 46% 48.8% 51.2% 18 46.2% 53.8% 40.6% 59.4% 19 48.7% 51.3% 44.2% 55.8% 20 55.9% 44.1% 54% 46% 21 47.1% 52.9% 45.5% 54.5% 22 46.3% 53.7% 45.6% 54.4% 23 45.1% 54.9% 44.5% 55.5% 24 52.2% 47.8% 51.4% 48.6% 25 52.1% 47.9% 49.8% 50.2% 26 63.4% 36.6% 63.3% 36.7% 27 42.6% 57.4% 43% 57%
District Schneiderman Donovan DiNapoli Wilson 1 44.7% 55.3% 44.2% 55.8% 2 44.6% 55.4% 44.2% 55.8% 3 47.4% 52.6% 47% 53% 4 49.1% 50.9% 49% 51% 5 84% 16% 83.3% 16.7% 6 60.2% 39.8% 58.5% 41.5% 7 82.5% 17.5% 80% 20% 8 82.1% 17.9% 81.1% 18.9% 9 85.1% 14.9% 84.3% 15.7% 10 71.8% 28.2% 64.8% 35.2% 11 37.9% 62.1% 44.6% 55.4% 12 75.1% 24.9% 66.2% 33.8% 13 91.7% 8.3% 87.9% 12.1% 14 73.4% 26.6% 71.3% 28.7% 15 93.6% 6.4% 92.7% 7.3% 16 65.5% 34.5% 61.2% 38.8% 17 54.1% 45.9% 49.4% 50.6% 18 47.6% 52.4% 44.9% 55.1% 19 47.7% 52.3% 43.2% 56.8% 20 52.9% 47.1% 46.1% 53.9% 21 46% 54% 40.1% 59.9% 22 46% 54% 37.8% 62.2% 23 44.2% 55.8% 37.9% 62.1% 24 50.6% 49.4% 42.4% 57.6% 25 53.3% 46.7% 43.4% 56.6% 26 55.3% 44.7% 48.4% 51.6% 27 37.6% 62.4% 31.1% 68.9%
About
Elections have consequences -- from the race for President to the race for one seat on a city council. The political economist Max Weber wrote that the state possesses a monopoly on the legitimate use of force. But in the United States, the state is divided into myriad federal, state, and local entities. And the elections to fill those entities are the products of the fascinating interactions between campaigns, party affiliations, voter turnout, and the media spotlight. Red Racing Horses analyzes those elections -- from a Republican-leaning perspective -- to keep a close eye on the process of electing officials, and to offer our perspective on the election-related issues of the day. Thank you for visiting, and we hope you'll enjoy the blog.
redracinghorses@yahoo.com
