Elections have consequences, from the race for President to the race for one seat on a city council. Those elections are the products of fascinating interactions between campaigns, party affiliations, voter turnout, and the media spotlight. Red Racing Horses analyzes and discusses elections from a Republican-leaning perspective. Thank you for visiting, and we hope you'll enjoy the blog.
~The RRH Moderators: BostonPatriot, Daniel Surman, GoBigRedState, Greyhound, James_Nola, Right Reformer, Ryan_in_SEPA, and Shamlet.
Problems logging into your account? Inside information? Complaints? Compliments? E-Mail us at: firstname.lastname@example.org. We check it often!
Before reading my article, I'd highly recommend you take a look at this piece about Greenwich, Darien, Westport, Norwalk, and Fairfield. You'll learn plenty about the people and politics of those towns. http://www.dailykos.com/story/...
Connecticut's 4th Congressional district is one of the most polarized Congressional districts in the country. Some of the wealthiest and some of the poorest Americans reside just miles apart in parts of this district that contains both towns like Greenwich, Darien, and New Canaan and cities like Bridgeport and Stamford.
The 4th district was represented well by Republican Chris Shays for 11 terms between 1987 and 2009. In 2008, Shays was defeated narrowly by current 4th district Representative Jim Himes by four points while Barack Obama carried the seat with 60% of the vote. Out of the 17 towns and cities in the district, only Bridgeport, Norwalk and Stamford voted for Himes but Shays, a Bridgeport resident, only pulled 19% in his home city, dooming his reelection prospects. Himes has since settled into his seat, defeating his 2010 challenger by a fairly strong margin of six points.
In a midterm year, the 4th district likely sits around D+1.5 but it voted D+3.7 in 2012. In a district where Mitt was such a tailor made fit, how did he do compared to John McCain's 2008 performance? Find out below the fold.
Below is a map that shows how each of the 17 towns and cities voted in comparison to their 2008 performances.
Light blue: 0 through 3% shift towards Obama
Salmon: 0 through 3% shift towards Romney
Red: 3 through 6% shift towards Romney
Crimson: 6 through10% shift towards Romney
Reddish Brown: 10+% shift towards Romney
Below is the data table I created and used while writing this article.
There isn't much to be said about CT-04, other than that it's out of reach with pseudo-moderate and inoffensive Rep Jim Himes, who defeated a strong but weakly funded opponent by 20 points in 2012, holding the seat. However, the wealthier the town in the district, the more it tended to swing towards Romney from its McCain performance. These four years of Obama's presidency has reminded the towns in CT-04, especially the WASPy ones, why they were once so Republican. Darien, Greenwich, New Canaan, Fairfield, Weston, and Westport each registered in at a swing of at least 8 points towards Romney from their McCain showings.
It's also worth noting that without Bridgeport in the district, Romney would have received 48.64% of the two-party vote in the 4th district, giving it an R+.5 PVI without Bridgeport. While Bridgeport does not simply magically disappear in a midterm, its turnout is especially abysmal in one. Meanwhile, the higher income towns in the 4th district's citizens turn out droves in a midterm. Romney matched or did slightly better than Bush '04 numbers in most of the towns of the district but fell through the floor compared to Bush's '04 performance. Therefore, his '04 performance was slightly more than 2 points worse than Bush's 2004 showing in the 4th district.
With Republican control of the US House all but secure for the decade, there's absolutely no reason not to push hard for CT-04 and CT-05 in a midterm election, especially if open. We've got nothing to lose, especially seeing as there are dozens of wealthy Republican businessmen in the district who could run strong, self-funded campaigns with no need for outside money.
Rundown of the Towns
Now for a treat... here's what a friend of the site from Connecticut had to say about each of the towns in the seat.
Greenwich: definition of Old money: Bush, Skakel, Regis; but now with hedgies & fashion folks like Tommy Hilfiger.
Stamford: once another heavily Italian satellite city of NYC; then a postwar Mecca of corporate HQ's; (Xerox, GE Capital); now in this century with new downtown high rises a "6th borough" of the City
Darien/New Canaan: interchangeable large lot WASP heritage top end suburbia. Republicanism still fashionable as this is corporate country; not celebrity country.
Norwalk: a denser and less affluent ( for the most part) city. Less corporate & fashionable than Stamford. Where Fairfield County finds big box stores. Historically Italian but less so over time
Westport: the cool suburb; bars, theatres, et al. Artsy, lots of Jewish residents. Once R but social issues have had their impact. Harv Weinstein lives here
Fairfield: where upper middle class folks live who can hack long train/Tpke commutes. Catholic influence--Fairfield U there.
Bridgeport: once industrial blue collar (Rowland carried city in 90) now post industrial minority transfer payments economy. Small ethnic enclaves left in Black Rock (129th AD) & North End (127).
Trumbull/Shelton: Where white Bridgeporters all moved. Fairly affluent, very Catholic, lots of extreme commuting except that Shelton's a small edge city now
Wilton/Ridgefield: newer and less dense New Canaans
Weston/Redding: newer and less dense Westport
Easton/Monroe: newer & less dense Trumbull
Oxford: should be in 5--really aligned with the 'Bury's